Going Rates for Researchers?

Could anyone give me an idea of the going rate for paid researchers at the Military History Institute at Carlisle or the National Archives? I spoke with one from Carlisle yetserday, and the rates sounded reasonable, but I really don’t have anything to base it on. Hourly rates were in the neighborhood of $35 the first hour, $25 after that, and $.50 a copy including shipping.

It would seem one could get a good bit of material in a pretty short period of time if you use the databases to tell your researcher very specifically what you’re looking for. A specific article from the Journal of the U.S. Cavalry Association from 1891, for example, I was able to locate to the call number and number of pages. In some cases, like the volumes of monthly cavalry returns I mentioned a few days ago, for example, more digging by the researcher will be called for.

Getting Started

One of my particular joys when starting a new project is in the hunt that is researching a topic — finding existing sources, figuring out how to find those sources, gathering material and putting the picture together, etc. While this site won’t be restricted to just one topic, I’ll be focusing on the Regular cavalry regiments and the Reserve Brigade initially.

While one would think this an easy search compared to other Civil War units, that isn’t necessarily the case. Regimental histories for volunteer regiments from the war abound, and in many cases provide excellent looks at what campaigning was like. The Regulars don’t appear to have done this. One reason is likely that their mission didn’t end when the war did. Following the Civil War, they were shifted back to the west where their attention quickly turned to the Indian Wars. I’ve been able to locate few memoirs to date. Fortunately, officers of the Regulars appear to have generally reported frequently and in detail where I’ve come across them thus far in my search of the OR.

One resource I discovered that should shed a bit of light on the subject is at the National Archives. Amongst their many resources are consolidated strength returns of cavalry units from 1863 to 1865. They’re arranged alphabetically by state, then regiment, so they should be user-friendly. The search results description was “this series contains a statistical summary of information relating to cavalry units, inlcuding the name of the department or corps, location, number of officers and enlisted men present and absent, number of serviceable and unserviceable horses, and kind of arms by number of carbines and pistols.” It won’t be of much help with anecdotes and such, but it’s a start.

Finding a niche

One of the difficulties facing a researcher or amateur historian in any field is finding a niche — someplace where they can contribute something new to the field instead of simply reviewing areas already covered by others. This is even more difficult when dealing with the Civil War, as seemingly every aspect has been covered by someone over the last 140-odd years.

The cavalry should be an easier field than most to find such a niche, as there aren’t all that many books out there dealing specifically with cavalry operations during the war. But what is out there covers the area pretty well at this point. From general works such as Starr’s three volumes on The Union Cavalry in the Civil War and Longacre’s Lincoln’s Cavalrymen and Lee’s Cavalrymen to specific works on individual regiments and battles, there’s a lot of great information out there.

An amusing anecdote: as an undergraduate, I mentioned to one of my professors that I wanted to cover the evolution of the Union Cavalry during the early phases of the Civil War, culminating in the Battle of Brandy Station. He assured me that there was no point in covering such an obscure field and that there would be little material and less interest in such a work. So it was with considerable amusement as well as enjoyment that I consumed Eric Wittenberg’s The Union Cavalry Comes of Age once I finally found it. I didn’t know how to find it, but I felt vindicated in that there was sufficient material out there.

I still feel that there is a definitive book waiting to be written on Brandy Station, as every book-length work that I’ve come across seems to come up a bit short. Hopefully Bud Hall will finish his work on the battle and successfully publish.

Since I’ve been living and working in Williamsburg the last two years, I’d thought to perhaps explore cavalry operations during the Peninisula campaign, a la The Cavalry at Gettysburg and The Cavalry at Appomattox. If the articles in Blue&Gray are any indicator, however, Robert O’Neill (the magazine’s at home, I apologioze if I misspelled your last name, Robert) has this topic well in hand.

So where to start carving out my own small corner of the cavalry? I think I will start with the regiments of the Regulars of the Reserve Brigade. Particularly the 2d Cavalry, since that’s been an unfinished project for far too long now. Cursory research on Google and Amazon don’t show anything, so perhaps there’s an opening here. Rush’s Lancers is in the on-deck circle on my reading shelf. If it proves as thorough as I suspect, it may be a history of the Reserve Brigade also, and it’ll be back to the drawing board. But I think there’s still a story to be told about the Regular cavalry regiments. So far as I’ve been able to determine, only one website, U.S. Regulars Archive, focuses on the Regular regiments, and it seems to focus more on the infantry and artillery regiments than the cavalry. One reason for this might be the difficulty of using Cornell University’s internet searchable version of the Official Records to find info on the Regular regiments.

Work on a timeline covering various engagements at Kelly’s Ford throughout the war for the Brandy Station Foundation continues, and might finally be completed before the summer. And since JD Petruzzi mentioned he’s working on a magazine article about cavalry depots, my curiosity’s been piqued about the Cavalry Bureau, how it was created, and why the Confederacy didn’t create something similar.

Review – Plenty of Blame to Go Around, Jeb Stuart’s Controversial Ride to Gettysburg

Although there is an amazing amount of published research and knowledge about the Civil War, surprisingly little of it focuses on the activities of the cavalry of each side. Very few book-length works focus on it. On the other hand, many are the books written about the Gettysburg campaign. Each year the battle seems to loom larger in the realm of Civil War lore.

In Plenty of Blame to Go Around, authors Eric Wittenberg and JD Petruzzi address one of the more controversial and surprisingly under-published aspects of the battle — where was JEB Stuart during the first two days of the battle? Why was he missing when Lee needed him most? Whose fault was it that he wasn’t there? These questions have never received the detailed attention that they deserve until now.Most authors spend a paragraph or two on Stuart’s absence, simply dismissing it as grandstanding on Stuart’s part. Petruzzi and Wittenberg walk the reader through the events as they unfold, and it becomes clear that his absence was the culmination of several events and decisions by Stuart and others. It’s not difficult to determine the authors’ opinion on where the blame lies from the title of the work, but they do an amazing job of laying out all of the available information for the reader to make his or her own decision. Indeed, they spend three chapters evenhandedly discussing the controversy from July 1863 until today before presenting their conclusions. This book would be worth the purchase price simply for this discussion.

This is a wonderful book. Historical research is supposed to add to the body of knowledge on a given subject, and this book certainly does so. It is incredibly well researched and documented. The bibliography is fifteen pages long, and eight of those list of primary sources. Many of these primary sources are published for the first time in this work. Footnotes are meticulously annotated and there are many of them. As with all of Wittenberg’s works, maps are plentiful and clearly enhance the reader’s understanding of the text. The text itself is nicely paced and very easy to follow. Both authors are well-respected authorities on Civil War cavalry, and this is clearly evident throughout the book.

For those interested in further studies on Civil war cavalry, I highly recommend Mr Wittenberg’s other works. The detailed research and thought put into this book are typical of his writing. He and Mr Petruzzi obviously have a good rapport, as it’s impossible for the reader to tell that two people wrote the book. Hopefully we’ll be seeing more work from both them in the future.

Cavalry Veterinary Surgeons during the Civil War

I discovered this while on the National Archives website earlier today. It was something that I hadn’t been aware of:

“By War Department General Order Number 259 of August 1, 1863, veterinary surgeons of cavalry, under a congressional act of March 3, 1863, were to be selected by the Chief of the Cavalry Bureau upon the nomination of the regimental commanders. The names of candidates so recommended and nominated to the Chief of the Bureau of Cavalry were then to be submitted to the Secretary of War for appointment.”